Should FIFA Expand the World Cup to 64 Teams?

World Cup expansion remains a hot topic as FIFA faces calls for even broader participation. Following the controversial increase to 48 teams for the 2026 tournament, the idea of a 64-team World Cup is now being floated, with considerable implications for global football.

World Cup Expansion: The Push for 64 Teams

World Cup expansion is not new to FIFA. The organization has steadily increased the number of participating nations over the decades, aiming to boost global representation and revenue. The 2026 World Cup, hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, will already feature 48 teams—up from 32 in previous tournaments. Now, CONMEBOL, South America’s football governing body, is lobbying FIFA President Gianni Infantino to consider an even greater leap to 64 nations for the 2030 World Cup.

The primary argument in favor of such expansion is inclusivity. More nations would have the chance to compete on the world’s biggest stage, potentially sparking football development in emerging territories and increasing the tournament’s global footprint. However, the logistics and competitive balance present significant challenges.

Who Would Benefit Most from a 64-Team World Cup?

If FIFA were to expand the World Cup to 64 teams, the greatest beneficiaries would be smaller footballing nations, particularly those in Africa, Asia, and North America, who often find qualification elusive. The increased number of slots would allow more countries to experience the World Cup firsthand, likely accelerating football’s growth in regions where the sport is still developing.

At the same time, established footballing powers—especially those from Europe and South America—might see the quality of early-stage matches diluted, as teams with less international experience enter the fray. There is also a strong possibility that teams like the USMNT would face far less pressure during qualifying, potentially coasting to the finals.

Challenges and Criticisms of Further Expansion

Despite the theoretical benefits, expanding the World Cup to 64 teams faces significant resistance. Many football administrators, particularly in Europe, argue that such an expansion could harm the tournament’s prestige. A Guardian source recently noted that FIFA’s council is overwhelmingly skeptical, believing that a 64-team field could damage the event’s quality and legacy.

Tournament logistics would also become more complex. More teams mean additional matches, venues, and travel, potentially prolonging the competition and increasing costs for organizers and fans alike. These hurdles make it unlikely that FIFA will push through a 64-team format for 2030, especially given the controversy already surrounding the jump to 48 teams.

Financial Motivation Behind World Cup Expansion

It is no secret that FIFA is motivated by the financial rewards of a larger World Cup. More teams and matches translate directly into greater television rights, sponsorship opportunities, and ticket sales. The governing body’s recent approach to the Club World Cup—relaxing qualification criteria and considering its own expansion—reflects this mindset.

However, the balance between financial gain and tournament integrity is delicate. Should FIFA prioritize revenue at the expense of quality, the World Cup risks losing its unique appeal as the pinnacle of international football.

The Role of UEFA and Future Prospects

UEFA, led by President Alexander Ceferin, has traditionally resisted major changes to the World Cup structure, emphasizing the importance of maintaining high competitive standards. While resistance is strong now, football’s landscape is ever-changing. By 2030, new generations of stars and shifting political dynamics could alter the conversation.

A 64-team World Cup would also mean the possible debut of many nations, offering emerging talents from all corners of the globe an unprecedented stage.

What Would a 64-Team World Cup Look Like?

A tournament of this scale would necessitate a radical overhaul in format. Group stages would likely expand, potentially leading to shorter knockout rounds or even more complex qualification pathways. The risk of one-sided matches in early rounds would increase, but so would the narratives of underdog success stories and global outreach.

Opinion: Balancing Growth and Tradition

The idea of World Cup expansion to 64 teams is bold and ambitious. While it promises broader participation and the chance for more nations to shine, it also risks oversaturating the tournament and diminishing the quality of play. Football thrives on both inclusivity and competitiveness; finding the right balance is crucial.

From a fan’s perspective, the magic of the World Cup lies in its ability to bring together the very best, creating unforgettable moments and fierce rivalries. While growth should always be on FIFA’s agenda, it’s essential that expansion does not come at the expense of sporting excellence.

For more insights and updates on global football, visit for more news.