Kroos Criticizes Bundesliga’s ‘Handshake Dialogue’ Rule

Bundesliga’s new handshake dialogue rule has sparked intense debate this season, with former Real Madrid star Toni Kroos leading the chorus of criticism. The seasoned midfielder, known for his candor both on and off the pitch, did not mince words as he slammed the rule as “absolutely no effect and no value.” Kroos’s remarks come as the German top-flight seeks to introduce measures aimed at sportsmanship and fair play, but the reception from high-profile figures has been anything but positive.

Bundesliga’s Handshake Dialogue Rule Explained

The ‘handshake dialogue’ rule implemented by Bundesliga authorities this season requires team captains and referees to meet for a handshake and brief discussion ahead of each match. The league’s intention is to foster mutual respect and understanding between players and officials, theoretically reducing tensions during games. However, while the idea may have noble ambitions, many within German football believe it misses the mark.

Toni Kroos Voices Strong Opposition

Kroos, who has enjoyed a trophy-laden career with both Real Madrid and the German national team, made headlines when he addressed the new rule on his podcast. “I almost fell off my chair when I heard about it,” he said, expressing incredulity at what he perceives as superficial solutions. Kroos argued, “This rule has absolutely no effect and no value. Football has far bigger issues to solve right now, like the ongoing VAR controversies that impact results and fan experience.”

Support from Bundesliga Managers

Kroos is not alone in his view. FC Köln manager Steffen Baumgart also labeled the handshake dialogue “nonsense,” suggesting that it distracts from more pressing concerns, such as officiating consistency and the use of technology in football. Baumgart’s comments echo a growing sentiment among players and coaches who feel that such rules are symbolic gestures rather than meaningful reforms.

Focus on the Real Issues: VAR and Game Integrity

Many critics argue that the Bundesliga should turn its attention to improving the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system, which has been the source of controversy since its introduction. Questionable VAR decisions have left fans, players, and coaches frustrated over inconsistent outcomes, overshadowing the league’s efforts to promote respect through symbolic rituals.

Kroos emphasized, “If the league wants to improve the game, they should prioritize transparency and reliability in refereeing decisions. These handshake dialogues won’t solve the problems affecting competitive integrity.”

Fan Reactions and Wider Implications

The reaction among Bundesliga fans has been mixed, with many echoing Kroos’s sentiment on social media. Supporters argue that while sportsmanship is vital, it cannot be enforced through ceremonial gestures. The real challenge, they say, lies in addressing the root causes of tension—primarily questionable officiating and lack of transparency.

Meanwhile, some fans appreciate the league’s attempts to encourage positive interactions, but agree the focus should remain on game-changing issues.

Bigger Conversations for the Bundesliga

The controversy surrounding the handshake dialogue rule has opened the door for a broader discussion about the direction of German football. Critics like Kroos and Baumgart argue that the Bundesliga risks losing credibility if it prioritizes symbolic acts over substantive reform. There is a growing call for league officials to engage with players, coaches, and fans to address the fundamental issues plaguing the game.

For those looking to stay updated on the latest developments and expert opinions in the world of football, visit for more news.

Opinion: Symbolism vs. Substance in Football Reform

In my view, Toni Kroos’s sharp criticism of the Bundesliga’s handshake dialogue rule is both timely and necessary. While promoting respect on the pitch is important, meaningful change requires more than pre-game rituals. The Bundesliga would be better served by focusing on VAR improvements, clearer communication with fans, and real solutions to the problems affecting match integrity. Symbolism has its place, but it should never come at the expense of substance.